9
$\begingroup$

Let $A,B$ two $n\times n$ matrices over a field $F$ and consider the usual Lie commutator $[A,B]=AB-BA$. As $[A,B]$ has trace zero, if the characteristic $p\geq 0$ of $F$ does not divide $n$ then $[A,B]$ cannot be the identity matrix. This is false when $p\vert n$, as the case $p=n=2$ easily shows.

In general, is it always possible to obtain the identity as a Lie commutator of two matrices, provided $p\vert n$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If it's true for $n=p$ then you can obtain a solution for $n = pk$ for all $k \geq 2$ by looking at block matrices. $\endgroup$ Commented 2 days ago
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Possible. See here: math.stackexchange.com/q/99175 $\endgroup$
    – te4
    Commented 2 days ago
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Specifically, this answer of the MSE question @te4 linked to provides a construction: math.stackexchange.com/a/99180/79593 $\endgroup$
    – Sam Hopkins
    Commented 2 days ago

2 Answers 2

13
$\begingroup$

This is just a community wiki answer to mark this question as answered.

As user te4 noted in a comment, in an answer to a MSE question, a simple construction of two $p\times p$ matrices $A$ and $B$ with $[A,B]=I$ over any field of characteristic $p$ was provided: $$A=\pmatrix{0&1\\&0&2\\&&\ddots&\ddots\\&&&0&p-1\\&&&&0}, B=\pmatrix{0\\1&0\\&\ddots&\ddots\\&&1&0\\&&&1&0}$$

As Najib Idrissi notes in another comment, a solution for $n=p$ provides one for $n = kp$ for any integer $k \geq 1$ via a block matrix construction.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ If you identity the matrices with operators on the space of polynomials considered modulo $x^p$, these two guys are $f\to df/dx$ and $f\to xf$, so, two most famous operators with identity commutant $\endgroup$ Commented 2 days ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @FedorPetrov good point! And this makes sense, given the connection to the Weyl algebra... $\endgroup$
    – Sam Hopkins
    Commented 2 days ago
12
$\begingroup$

Here is a conceptual approach. As Mariano did on math.SE, we start with the observation that this is equivalent to finding finite-dimensional modules over the Weyl algebra

$$A = K\langle x, \partial \rangle/([\partial, x] - 1)$$

in positive characteristic. In characteristic $0$, the Weyl algebra is simple and has an infinite-dimensional simple module given by polynomials $K[x]$, on which it acts by differential operators. Simplicity implies it has no nonzero finite-dimensional quotients and hence no nonzero finite-dimensional modules.

In positive characteristic, $K[x]$ is no longer a simple module. The proof that it's simple in characteristic $0$ goes like this: starting from a nonzero polynomial $f \in K[x]$, we can repeatedly apply the derivative $\partial$ until we get a nonzero scalar, then act on this scalar by $x$ until we get every polynomial. In characteristic $p$, repeatedly applying the derivative is no longer guaranteed to produce a nonzero scalar since we now have

$$\partial(x^p) = px^{p-1} = 0$$

and in fact the ideal $I = (x^p)$ of polynomials divisible by $x^p$ is now a maximal proper submodule of $K[x]$. So we can quotient by it, obtaining $K[x]/x^p$, which is now a $p$-dimensional simple module on which $\partial$ and $x$ act by the matrices $A$ and $B$ in Sam Hopkins' answer, as Fedor Petrov points out.

The proof that the Weyl algebra is simple in characteristic $0$ is very similar and breaks down in the same way; when we inspect how that proof breaks down we learn that in characteristic $p$ the center of the Weyl algebra is $K[x^p, \partial^p]$, and we can now produce finite-dimensional quotients of $A$ by tensoring with morphisms $K[x^p, \partial^p] \to K$. The above module comes from tensoring with evaluation at the origin, which sets $x^p = \partial^p = 0$. In general we can set $x^p = a, \partial^p = b$ for any scalars $a, b \in K$ and, as Mariano explains, we get a $p^2$-dimensional simple algebra with center $K$, which therefore must be isomorphic to $M_p(K)$, so has a unique $p$-dimensional simple module. Conversely, if $K$ is algebraically closed, the center acts by scalars on any finite-dimensional simple module by Schur's lemma, so in this case this construction actually produces all finite-dimensional simple modules.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.